Friday, October 18, 2002

Now Offering World Famous Books By Tom Schauf

Now Offering World Famous Books By Tom Schauf

Good Morning Everyone,

Just received my shipment of Books by Tom Schauf. I am honored to be able to offer them to my friends and family. The two books sell as a set and are titled:

1. How To Cancel Your Bank Loans Without Going To Court
2. The American Voters vs. The Banking System.

These two books are being sold all over the United States and it is my goal to help Tom get the truth out to as many people as I can. You can purchase both books for 57.00 and that includes shipping and handling. I will send them out to you personally. Simply email me and leave me your telephone number and I will call you back to answer any questions you may have. Email me at emorel48@aol.com or you can call toll free:1-877-322-3124 and I will get back in touch with you. These two books opened my eyes to what is really happening to us. Questions like; Why are so many people going bankrupt? Why is our country now considered a Debtor Nation? Tom answers these questions and more in these priceless books. Order you copies today. You will be glad you did.
God Bless
Elaine
Thou hast taken usury and increase, and thou hast greedily gained of thy neighbor by extortion, and hast forgotten me, saith the Lord God.
--Ezekiel 22:12








Wednesday, October 16, 2002

WILL THE GOVERNMENT COLLAPSE WITHOUT INCOME TAX REVENUES?

Thank you Devvy Kidd! Here is the article that will answer this common question asked by those still deluded by the media that our taxes go to pay for government programs! Devvy definitely will stir up your cognitive dissonance with this article. I am placing a quote below from the article followed by a link to the site to read it in it's entirety. You do not want to miss this one. It is like climbing onto Space Mountain and getting ready for the ride! I truly hope to meet this lady who is now working with We The People and the Freedom Drive. So. Hold to your hat and get ready to Rumble!!!!!

WILL THE GOVERNMENT COLLAPSE WITHOUT INCOME TAX REVENUES?


Devvy Kidd
Project on Winning Economic Reform
P.O. Box 60543, Sacramento, CA 95860
May 11, 1999


The answer is no. As you will see from the pie charts below, the "income tax" goes to pay the usury to the bankers who own the private Federal Reserve. For those who doubt that the "Fed" is indeed private, I invite you to do your homework down at the law library and you'll find a treasure trove of cases where the courts consistently rule that the "Reserve Banking System" as they call it, are "locally owned and privately controlled corporations."

Congress sets a budget. There is never enough money to pay for all these cash cows of special interest groups, so there is a shortfall (deficit). The money collected by the IRS goes for fraud, waste and to pay down this invisible "national debt". Thus, Congress is dependent upon social security taxes, excise taxes, etc. The situation will only get worse until this private banking cartel is shut down and according to an article in the Wall Street Journal, October 7, 1998, in a decade or so, payroll taxes will be a whopping 55%! How do you suppose you're going to live on what's left after all the other taxes you pay to state and local municipalities? This insanity just can't continue.

You will never get big enough raises because you'll just see that increase eaten by taxes. People are now being forced to charge what they allegedly owed to the IRS on credit cards last month. The more we make, the more they will take because the interest on this national debt continues to compound daily - think about 10% interest charged every day on $5.9 trillion dollars. The debt grows at a rate of $9 million dollars a second. This is sick. The government is paying the bills with social security, excise taxes, military hardware sales, etc. Roughly $16 billion from the private "Fed" gets dumped into the Treasury under the Federal Reserve Act itself. That will buy 8 of our stealth bombers. Congress will probably approve the budget this year at around $1.6 trillion. Does anyone see a problem here? Cut out the "Fed" and you remove the middle man. Nothing real complicated here except for the fact that 90% of Congress have no clue about our monetary system and the American people as a whole, tragically, don't have a clue either and most of them don't even want to know.

For the rest of the article click here:
http://www.devvy.com/collapse.html







"Today, when a concerted effort is made to obliterate this point, it cannot be repeated too often that the Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals - that it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government - that it is not a charter FOR government power, but a charter of the citizens' protection AGAINST the government."
-- Ayn Rand

Grass Roots Organizations Work To End Unconstitutional Taxation!

It is such a blessing to see the beginnings of the end of the Unconstitutional Taxation in this country. Groups around the nation have rallied and are moving to end the unfair communistic taxation that the people in this country have been forced (I thought it was voluntary!) to pay.Here is another article from the WorldNetDaily.Com that highlights a meeting in Atlanta for grassroots citizens. The movement is strong and I believe it is just a matter of time before the politicians will have to listen to the people. Get involved and help us protect our kids and grandkids from 60% tax rates of the future that will be used just to pay the interest to the Monster Federal Reserve for loaning us our own money! The Truth Really Will Set Us Free!
God Bless America!

To read the entire article click here: Grass Roots Fight To End Unconstitutional Taxes!


Another Article of interest today at World Net Daily is by Hal Lindsey. Want to know where we are in light of Bible Prophecy? The newest event happened last Friday. To read this exciting incident go to: Jerusalem Mufti Inciting Armageddon!




"Today, when a concerted effort is made to obliterate this point, it cannot be repeated too often that the Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals - that it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government - that it is not a charter FOR government power, but a charter of the citizens' protection AGAINST the government."
-- Ayn Rand

Tuesday, October 15, 2002

EXCEPT A KERNEL OF WHEAT FALL TO THE GROUND

Tonight I want to take a break from the seriousness of the hour and share with you a beautiful story sent to me by a pastor friend of ours, Ralph Davis. Sometimes we just have to sit back and forget our troubles and remember that many are walking through the trials of life even now. However in the end we are are brought to realize that God is in Control and he loves us so much. I hope you enjoy this true story about a missionary family of days gone by.
God Bless
Elaine

A Kernel of Wheat

Scripture: John 12:24:
"I tell you the truth, unless a kernel of wheat falls to the ground
and dies, it remains only a single seed. But if it dies, it produces
many seeds." NIV

Back in 1921, a missionary couple named David and Svea Flood went with
their two-year-old son from Sweden to the heart of Africa to what was
then called the Belgian Congo. They met up with another young
Scandinavian couple, the Ericksons, and the four of them sought God
for direction. In those days of much tenderness and devotion and
sacrifice, they felt led of the Lord to set out from the main mission
station and take the gospel to a remote area.

This was a huge step of faith. At the village of N'dolera they were
rebuffed by the chief, who would not let them enter his town for fear
of alienating the local gods. The two couples opted to go half a mile
up the slope and build their own mud huts.

They prayed for a spiritual breakthrough, but there was none. The only
contact with the villagers was a young boy, who was allowed to sell
them chickens and eggs twice a week. Svea Flood a tiny woman only four
feet, eight inches tall decided that if this was the only African she
could talk to, she would try to lead the boy to Jesus. And in fact,
she succeeded. But there were no other encouragements.

Meanwhile, malaria struck one member of the little band after another.
In time the Ericksons decided they had had enough suffering and left
to return to the central mission station. David and Svea Flood
remained near N'dolera to go on alone.

Then, of all things, Svea found herself pregnant in the middle of the
primitive wilderness. When time came for her to give birth, the
village chief softened enough to allow a midwife to help her. A little
girl was born, whom they named Aina. The delivery, however, was
exhausting, and Svea Flood was already weak from bouts of malaria. The
birth process was a heavy blow to her stamina. She lasted less than
twenty days.

Inside David Flood, something snapped the moment his wife died. He
dug a crude grave, buried his twenty-seven-year-old wife, and then
took his children back down the mountain to the mission station.
Giving his newborn daughter to the Erickson’s, he snarled, "I'm going
back to Sweden. I've lost my wife, and I obviously can't take care of
this baby. God has ruined my life." With that, he headed for the port,
with a hired man carrying Aina down the mountain in a hammock-cradle,
all the while he was rejecting not only his calling, but God himself.

Within eight months both the Erickson’s were stricken with a
mysterious malady and died within days of each other. The baby was
then turned over to some American missionaries, who adjusted her
Swedish name to "Aggie" and eventually brought her back to the United
States when she was three. This family loved the little girl and were
afraid that if they tried to return to Africa, some legal obstacle
might separate her from them. So they decided to stay in the United
States and switch from missionary work to pastoral ministry in South
Dakota.

Aggie grew to a young woman and attended North Central Bible College
in Minneapolis, Minnesota. There she met and married a young man named
Dewey Hurst.

Years passed. The Hurst’s enjoyed a fruitful Ministry. Aggie gave
birth first to a daughter, then a son. In time her husband became
president of a Christian College in the Seattle area, and Aggie was
intrigued to find so much Scandinavian heritage in that area.

One day a Swedish religious magazine mysteriously appeared in her
mailbox. She had no idea who had sent it, and of course she couldn't
read the words. But as she turned the pages, all of a sudden a photo
stopped her cold. There in a primitive setting was a grave with a
white cross and on the cross were the words SVEA FLOOD.

Aggie jumped in her car and went straight for a college faculty member
who, she knew, could translate the article. "What does this say?" she
demanded. The instructor summarized the story: It was about
missionaries who had come to N'dolera long ago ... the birth of a
white baby ... the death of the young mother ... the one little
African boy who had been led to Christ ... and how, after the whites
had all left, the boy had grown up and finally persuaded the chief to
let him build a school in the village.

The article said that gradually the little African boy had won all his
students to Christ... the children led their parents to Christ... even
the chief had become a Christian. Today there were six hundred
Christian believers in that one village.... All because of the
sacrifice of David and Svea Flood so many years ago.

For the Hurst’s' twenty-fifth wedding anniversary, the college
presented them with the gift of a vacation to Sweden. There Aggie
sought to find her real father. An old man now, David Flood had
remarried, fathered four more children, and generally dissipated his
life with alcohol.

He had recently suffered a stroke. Still bitter, he had one rule in
his family: "Never mention the name of God because God took everything
from him. After an emotional reunion with her half brothers and half
sister, Aggie brought up the subject of seeing her father. The others
hesitated.

"You can talk to him," they replied, "even though he's very ill now.
But you need to know that whenever he hears the name of God, he flies
into a rage.” Aggie was not to be deterred. She walked into the
squalid apartment, with liquor bottles everywhere, and approached the
seventy-three-year-old man lying in a rumpled bed.

"Papa," she said tentatively. He turned and began to cry. "Aina," he
said. "I never meant to give you away." "It's all right, Papa," she
replied, taking him gently in her arms. "God took care of me. The man
instantly stiffened. The tears stopped. "God forgot all of us. Our
lives have been like this because of him." He turned his face back to
the wall.

Aggie stroked his head and then continued, undaunted. "Papa, I've got
a little story to tell you, and it's a true one. You didn't go to
Africa in vain. Mama didn't die in vain. The little boy you won to the
Lord grew up to win that whole village to Jesus Christ. The one seed
you planted just kept growing and growing. Today there are six hundred
African people serving the Lord because you were faithful to the call
of God in your life.”

"Papa, Jesus loves you. He has never hated you. The old man turned
back to look into his daughter's eyes. His body relaxed. He began to
talk. And by the end of the afternoon, he had come back to the God he
had resented for so many decades. Over the next few days, father and
daughter enjoyed warm moments together.

Aggie and her husband soon had to return to America and within a few
weeks, David Flood had gone into eternity. A few years later, the
Hurst’s were attending a high-level evangelism conference in London,
England, when a report was given from the nation of Zaire (the former
Belgian Congo). The superintendent of the national church,
representing some 110,000 baptized believers, spoke eloquently of the
gospel's spread in his nation.

Aggie could not help going to ask him afterward if he had ever heard
of David and Svea Flood. "Yes, madam,” the man replied in French, his
words then being translated into English. "It was Svea Flood who led
me to Jesus Christ. I was the boy who brought food to your parents
before you were born. In fact, to this day your mother's grave and her
memory are honored by all of us."

He embraced her in a long, sobbing hug. Then he continued, "You must
come to Africa to see, because your mother is the most famous person
in our history." In time that is exactly what Aggie Hurst and her
husband did. They were welcomed by cheering throngs of villagers. She
even met the man who had been hired by her father many years before to
carry her back down the mountain in a hammock-cradle.

The most dramatic moment, of course, was when the pastor escorted
Aggie to see her mother's white cross for herself. She knelt in the
soil to pray and give thanks. Later that day, in the church, the
pastor read from:

John 12:24: "I tell you the truth, unless a kernel of wheat falls to
the ground and dies, it remains only a single seed. But if it dies, it
produces many seeds." NIV

He then followed with:
Psalm 126:5: "Those who sow in tears will reap with songs of joy." NIV

Prayer: Father, how magnificent You are to take one seed and turn it
into the foundation for an entire nation. In the name of the Lord
Jesus Christ. Amen!

If The Dems Maintain Control Of The House! Think About It!

Neil Boortz writing in the World Net Daily today, explains what happens if the Dems keep control of the Senate. This election is crucial to the New World Order and their plan for world control. It is absolutely imperitave that we all get out and vote this time and pray for our nation. I believe that we are at the turning point for America. Click on the link below for his stunning article.
God Bless
Elaine

Neil Boortz: Socialist To Regain Control Of Congress











"Today, when a concerted effort is made to obliterate this point, it cannot be repeated too often that the Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals - that it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government - that it is not a charter FOR government power, but a charter of the citizens' protection AGAINST the government."
-- Ayn Rand

Monday, October 14, 2002

DISCUSSION BOARD IS OPEN!

THE LIBERTY BELL DISCUSSION BOARD

I am happy to announce that the Liberty Bell Discussion Board is up and running and I cannot wait to hear from all of you. Visit today and let your views and opinions be known. We may never get to talk on The Rush Limbaugh Show but you will be heard at the message boards. To participate, you need only sign up for free and then post to your hearts content . Hope to see you there soon!

To sign up go to: http://forums.goingplatinum.com/gp-libertybell/start
God Bless
Elaine



"Today, when a concerted effort is made to obliterate this point, it cannot be repeated too often that the Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals - that it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government - that it is not a charter FOR government power, but a charter of the citizens' protection AGAINST the government."
-- Ayn Rand

What About Local And State Governments?? Think About It!

Wonder why the Local and State Governments can prevent churches from building in their towns? What ever happened to property rights in America? Well people are waking up and asking questions and putting forth solutions to the problem. Here is one I thought you might enjoy. This is truly one article to Think About!
God Bless
Elaine

Changing State Government from the Bottom Up
by Joseph A. Swyers


Joe has been a member of the Leadville, Colorado city council since January 2000 and is a former member of the Libertarian Party. He owns a small retail store and is a past adjunct faculty member at Colorado Mountain College.

Our free country is broken because Americans have increasingly become a culture of ever more dependence on government and of using government power against one’s neighbors for nearly any issue great or small. It may be an innate characteristic of humans to use power to the maximum extent they can get away with.

In America the abuse of power has been predominantly enabled by the state governments. Power has been gathered by the federal level because the states have permitted it by abdication of their states’ rights. The states have directly used power against individuals, families, and communities. And the states have given or mandated ever more power to local governments -- which, in turn, have often used that power to the maximum extent permissible by state statute. Often they tax to the statutory limit and impose all the building, planning & zoning and other codes that statutes permit (this I know because we are doing it).

How can a relatively small cadre of liberty-minded activists begin to reverse this trend? Such small groups are effectively marginalized to ineffectiveness at the federal level. This is also the case in most, if not all, states. Top down attempts have not worked. Liberty-minded people have been unable to win and persevere in state or federal offices which could enable a top-down approach to work. Winning one or a few seats in a legislature of dozens or hundreds of representatives or senators results in marginalization of liberty-minded legislators. The few who make it that far find their efforts vastly outweighed by not only other legislators but by immense, entrenched, control-minded bureaucracies. Even the smallest of state governments presently are generally too big for a relatively small cadre of liberty-minded people to successfully influence except by voter initiatives and expensive campaigns to pass those initiatives.

Voter initiatives have been often successful where they are permitted by state statute. In those states where voter initiatives are not permitted, how do liberty-minded activists get that freedom? The legislatures are quite unlikely to give away their power and risk being undermined by voter initiatives. And a voter initiative to gain the ability to have voter initiatives is the proverbial chicken and egg or Catch 22. Thus perhaps only states which already have a voter initiative process should be considered by the FSP.

Attempts at a state level, whether by initiative or by the legislature, to restrict government at a state or local level are met with fierce resistance by state and local governments. As we've seen with Colorado initiatives, fear mongering by community “leaders” and their supporters is common. Sheriffs, police chiefs, fire chiefs, chambers of commerce, city councils, school boards, and county commissioners are enlisted by their state-level organizations and by each other’s organizations to fight such initiatives. Often the only initiatives that survive such a full court press are tax limitations because taxpayers will nearly always vote for lower taxes (but not fewer services -- regardless of these conflicting goals).

Because of the entrenched power of local government leaders and the voters who listen to such leaders’ advice, and because of the addiction of people to laws that tax and regulate their neighbors, I propose a bottom up solution to change this culture of dependence and abuse of power at the grassroots level.

Some of the proposed repeals or revisions of codes, laws, and taxes at the local level may seem too minor for political parties to bother with. But the pervasive effect of such laws upon individuals, families, neighborhoods, communities, and small businesses and other organizations that these depend upon is underestimated by those who focus on state and federal governments. Furthermore, for the reasons detailed above, changing such laws is far easier at a local level than jousting with state or federal governments. A small cadre of liberty-minded activists can make substantive changes on local boards, whereas their few numbers are marginalized at state and federal levels.

Activists can start with repealing planning and zoning codes and many of the other codes which restrict individual freedoms and compromise property rights. Then help neighbors and voters adjust to each others newfound freedoms to build or remodel or to start businesses. Such minor-seeming freedoms as enjoying fireworks or not cutting one’s grass or working on a car in the driveway can begin to change the habit of worrying about a code enforcer looking at one’s property.

Local governments can re-instill a sense of property rights and individual freedoms. They can make it clear to neighbors that a person’s property line is inviolate. They can restrict local agencies to helping people rather than being code enforcers which people are reluctant to let into their homes. People can regain a sense of trust in local police, ambulance and fire departments. People should not have to worry about calling the fire department or an ambulance or letting a police officer come into their home to help them. Because they are ill or injured or have a fire and need help should not also get them subsequently arrested for what they may have in their home -- the mere possession of which does not injure anyone.

Often “property values” are cited by voters, owners, and neighbors as a valid reason for such local codes. Why should government be partners in real estate speculation? Local governments should instead defend people’s freedom to possess and use their property. The respect and defense of property lines extends in both directions. As long as a person does not force nuisances or harm upon one’s neighbors they should be able to do what they want, as they want, on their own property and in their homes.

Local governments can affect enforcement even of state or federal laws by interceding and defending the private property line as inviolate. They can restrict the defacto trespass by any agency upon private property to arrest people, confiscate property or impose restrictions when people on that property are harming nobody but perhaps themselves (victimless crimes).

As people at a local level become more used to basic liberties they will become more adamant about their personal and private property and their individual freedoms. As more individuals and communities learn they can depend on their local governments to stand with them in defense of their private property rights and individual freedoms, then ever higher levels of government will be persuaded by voting majorities to also defend such rights and freedoms. Larger cities and counties will come around as a majority of their neighborhoods and towns demand liberty-minded changes to municipal and county ordinances. The state legislators from those areas will then champion such freedoms in their legislatures - or else pay for it at the local polls back home in their districts. A majority of legislators will be able to change the state laws and even override a governor if necessary. How far a state can go in telling the feds to leave their people alone remains to be seen. But, again, heavy-handed invasive federal law enforcement can be severely compromised if the state and local police refuse to help or insist on helping their own people instead. At least it is a beginning -- which is more than the top-down approach has yielded.


You may ask what can I do to help. Sign up today with We The People!

September 25, 2002






"Today, when a concerted effort is made to obliterate this point, it cannot be repeated too often that the Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals - that it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government - that it is not a charter FOR government power, but a charter of the citizens' protection AGAINST the government."
-- Ayn Rand

Sunday, October 13, 2002

Thoughts From Ayn Rand: Think About It......

Here is a quote to think about. It happened during the era of my grandparents and parents. How far we have come!

AYN RAND ON TYRANNY

See any parallels here? From the March 1996 issue of The Intellectual Activist,
the Grand Dame of rational objectivism is quoted thusly:

'"On February 5, 1937, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt proposed legislation to
'pack' the supreme Court by increasing the number of justices by as many as six
should any justice over the age of 70 refuse to retire. The following excerpt is
taken from a letter written on February 9, 1937 by Ayn Rand to the New York
Herald-Tribune in opposition to Roosevelt's proposal:

'No tyranny in history has ever been established overnight. The method of
dictators has always been a slow, gradual, well-calculated series of measures,
each one of them seemingly innocent enough, easily alibied and explained by the
ruler as embodying the best intentions in the world, and not one of them clear,
direct and sufficiently flagrant to make the entire people - every single man on
the street - realize that it affects him personally.

'Each measure is passed without great trouble or violent public opposition
because the average man does not see at the time, how it can possibly affect his
own existence -the only thing he is really interested in. Then, one day, he
awakens suddenly to realize all his rights and liberties are gone. He cannot say
exactly how or when it happened. He sees only the cumulative effect of single
measures he did not consider important at the time he accepted them. He may be
horrified and he may want to scream in protest. But it is too late to protest.

'The vast majority of Americans have not the slightest interest in politics. They
think that whatever happens in Washington applies only to a vague entity called
'the country' and perhaps to those vague arch-villains, the big corporations but
the worst effect it can possibly have on them, the private citizens personally,
is the slight nuisance of increased taxes. They take their civil rights for
granted and haven't the slightest idea of what makes these rights possible.
Hasn't the time come to point out to them that they have no rights whatever, not
even the right to remain alive, unless there exists some institution to protect
and guarantee these rights to them?

'If all the power in the country is centered in one hand - who is going to see
that that hand exercises it correctly? And if those in power wish to take a
citizen's life - who can stop them by pointing to the law, when they are the law?
What good is a constitution when there is no one to see that it is observed?
Russia has a liberal constitution too yet Russian citizens can be executed
without trial. Their constitution-makers conveniently forgot to provide an
independent organ to watch that the constitution be obeyed.

'Germany has elections too only there's no independent organization to check on
the polls. Does everybody understand that a constitution is not written to
protect the government from the people, but to protect the people from the
government? A constitution is only a people's safeguard. And if this safeguard is
left entirely at the mercy of those against whom it is supposed to guard - isn't
it just as absurd and useless as a lock placed on a door against burglars, with
the key entrusted to the burglars?"

Visit tomorrow for more facts on the Federal Reserve. Also, I am excited that we will be adding a Message Forum and Chat area for the Liberty Bell Blog site. I will be adding a link soon that will allow you to comment on what is happening in our country and world. I pray we can get many people interested in sharing information and links to sites where more can be learned. I hope each one of you will sign up to participate in the message board activities and I look forward to seeing you there. Stay tuned for the link to the site!